Killing Things, Taking Their Stuff
Can I confess to you something? I don’t like what most people think of when they say ‘role-playing game’. I have run dozens of RPG campaigns, GMed probably thousands of sessions in my lifetime, and I feel that I have settled on what I consider to be the ‘true’ definition of a role-playing game, and it is not the same thing as what appears to be the common definition.
What is this common definition? Put simply, most RPGs are some variation of the theme ‘Killing Things to Take Their
Stuff.’ That is, your objective is to group together with your buddies, find a bad guy, kill it with your magic/guns/swords/giant robots/ninja techniques, and thereby acquire its gold/technology/experience points/chi/karma etc, etc.. Essentially every video RPG does this (MMORPGs do this to the virtual exclusion of all else), D&D is built around this mechanic, and most games inspired by or based off of the D&D structure do something similar, if not precisely the same. Even games that claim to be something else are still based off the same basic idea. The point of an RPG, to the wider world, is to go into a fanciful world of some kind, portray some kind of hero, and kill something for the purpose of acquiring X so that you can become more Y.
I hate this.
I hate this because it is completely antithetical to what I think an RPG should be. An RPG is all about the RP part, and less about the G part. To you uninitiated (and kudos for still reading this, by the way), that is to say that the Role Playing portion of the RPG takes precedence (or should) over the Game part. RPGs should always be about telling a story more than it is playing a game. The game should act as arbiter for disputes and should also function to enhance the story somehow, but it always, always, always takes a back seat to story. This underlying philosophy is why I rankle at complaints regarding ‘game balance’ in certain systems and why I rarely use the same system twice across campaigns.
Why is story so important? Well, let me answer that question with a question of my own: why is the game part important? What is it supposed to do, if not what I have thus far laid out? RPGs are not ‘competitive’ exercises, really, and they aren’t about moving spaces on a board and planning out esoteric strategies within the confines of the rules. If you want those things, play a strategy game–they do it better and they are just as much fun without having the added complications of plot and character hanging around to foul things up. This is part of my problem with the current iteration of 4th Edition D&D, which has essentially been degraded to a video game played out with miniatures and gridmaps; story is a trapping laid over top of what is basically a simplistic strategy game and a number-crunching engine. Boo!
There is so much potential for RPGs to be really, really memorable collaborative storytelling exercises. Allowing game mechanics to take precendence over story is mind-boggling, as is running a game without careful thought to how game mechanics are going to interfere with the story and addressing those concerns before play begins. The acquisition of imaginary stuff is boring, for the most part (I go more in-depth regarding my thoughts on PC gear here), and combat has nothing interesting going for it without story backing it up. At some point it stops being heart-pounding action and starts to become work. The verb ‘to grind’ is used in reference to leveling up in video games not because it’s lighthearted fun, you know, but because it’s mind-numbingly boring, repetitive, and soul-killing. I want things to be interesting all the time, or at least as much of the time as I can manage it. I want combat to be tense. I want players on the edge of their seats. I want people to cheer when they survive a deathtrap, to sigh when they make a narrow escape from the palace guards, or to grind their teeth while the villain laughs at their folly. None of that stuff happens without a focus on story; all of that stuff can be easily messed up by an over-emphasis on game mechanics.
I played an MMORPG once–Age of Camelot. I played a Dwarf named Durglethok. I spent hours and hours, more or less alone, wandering through the wilderness killing giant ants and selling their carapaces for pennies in some mountain village. I was, in essence, an exterminator who could throw lightning. After a while of this, I got bored and took a horse (which in that game was a lot like a train or a flight) to some other village. This village was surrounded by larger ants that kept killing me. I ran out of money to get another horse out of town and wound up sitting in the streets, literally begging for change. After an hour or two of doing this, I stopped myself and asked ‘why am I doing this?’ I put the game down, never played again, and have never been tempted to play another MMPORPG again. There was no interesting story in which to involve myself–I was a peon in a world very much like our own, except without a functioning welfare system. The designers had the audacity to request money from me for this privledge. Ugh…
It’s much the same feeling I get when I watch friends of mine spend hours and hours playing Morrowind or now, I suppose, Skyrim. It’s the same grumble I feel in my gut when I hear that there are D&D ‘tournaments’ where they apparently crown winners and losers of some kind. It’s an offense to what this genre of entertainment is capable of. They’re taking the opportunity to let the players star in their own personal movie or adventure story and degrading it to basic exercises in probability and economics. On the whole, I’d rather play Axis and Allies, if that’s the way we’re going. Those of you who know me know just what a damning admission that is.
Posted on December 12, 2011, in Gaming and tagged Age of Camelot, D&D, game mechanics, GMs, MMPORPGs, Morrowind, RPGs, Skyrim, storytelling. Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.
Some excellent points — I know I feel this way when my PC’s are squabbling over loot, instead of dealing with the Emotional Crisis du Jour.
But to be fair, as a gamer [tabletop and video game] — there’s something primal about getting – ahem – “teh loots”. XP, gold — a new hat that lets you turn into a dire skunk. They scratch something deep in my cerebral cortex, some silly lizard-brain/hunter gatherer type thing.
So, I agree with the bulk of your points – but I do understand the appeal of all those imaginary shinies.
Yeah, I get the fun involved in getting cool stuff (I’ve played tricked out street samurai in Shadowrun just like everybody else, and loved it). I think, however, the stuff should be something that makes the story more interesting rather than just having stuff. XP, additionally, should be used as something to motivate good storytelling and interesting gameplay rather than simply an end in itself.
Heartily agreed. My favorite thing is to give the coolest magical items in my campaign a serious drawback. Like a key that will open any door, but you have to pay the price in blood/HP — or a deadly assassin’s blade that emits a piercing trumpet fanfare if ever used at night.
I think it had a 60-foot aura of light as well.
Maybe I’m just a dick to my players.
There’s a line to be tread, I think. I also like powerful stuff with drawbacks, so long as players have an opportunity to really enjoy using the object. They need to have fun before all else, of course.
You can choose from two classes: american ninja and magical black man. You are all employees of a political figure, and you have to finesse some situation with his engaged son and gambling debts to mobbed-up inlaws. How do you get from here to being in a cave filled with large ants?
Also, character sheets cannot have “adventurer” as a profession.
Rpg should be more about the rp and less about the g? Should? Says you. And you are nobody. I prefer gamist GAMES. If i want a touchy feely roleplaying session, Ill go to couples therapy or join a drama club. Finding interesting and story driven ways to kill things and take their stuff is a fine thing for an rpg. As a matter of fact, killing things and taking their stuff is what drives quite a lot of fantasy and sci fi plots in books and films. The most boring and cringe inducing thing i can imagine is an rpg that runs like an impromptu stage production of a soap opera. Blech.