Where Have All the Good Guys Gone?

I was watching CNN’s documentary on the 1960s last night (which is interesting viewing, incidentally, if you want a quick overview of the decade), and in this particular episode it discussed how television (to paraphrase) was an escape from the darkness, fear, and unease that permeated the society at large. It was an age of zany sitcoms and upbeat variety shows while, on the evening news, the lists of American’s injured or killed in Vietnam was top news, college campuses were rioting, and black people were getting shot, bombed, sprayed with hoses, and assaulted with attack dogs all because they wanted basic human rights.

Ah, yes…that old “feel good” escapist series about the good guy serial killer…

Now, everything in the latter half there should sound awfully familiar in our current era – the dead soldiers, the riots and demonstrations among the youth, and the mistreatment of African Americans marching for basic equality. What doesn’t sound familiar (at least to me) is the characterization of television as “zany.” Sure, there’s a docket of late night variety shows (though how much “variety” is present is debatable), but few of them are “zany” (with the possible exception of Jimmy Fallon). We’ve got sitcoms, too, but they have a lot less in common with The Dick VanDyke Show and Gilligan’s Island – with their “wholesome” and harmless optimism – and rely, instead, on cynicism, sarcasm, and insult comedy (look at any Chuck Lorre sitcom and despair).

As for dramas…yeesh. You know, when Dexter is one of the more optimistic offerings out there, you’ve got to step back and wonder what on Earth is wrong with us. Game of ThronesBreaking Bad, The ExpanseThe Magicians, The Walking Dead, The Blacklist, Man in the High Castle – we’re looking at a veritable who’s-who of dark, depressing, morally ambiguous, and emotionally wrenching stories that catch our collective attention. How many millions of people tuned in to watch Negan swing a baseball bat into somebody’s head, anyway?

What exactly does this say about us?

Now, mind you, I enjoy a lot of these shows. I like moral ambiguity and complex stories without clear resolutions. I do wonder, however, if all this misery, pain, and negativity saturating our entertainment is good for us on an emotional level. As the world gets darker and more disturbing around us with each passing year, wouldn’t it be more natural for us to go all-in with shows like The Good Place, which aspire to a generally positive tone and outlook? It seems this is what Supergirl and The Flash are trying to do, anyway, but (at least personally) something about those shows leaves me flat. They just lack a certain…darkness that I’ve come to expect.

And that last there is what vaguely worries me. Granted, it isn’t like I’ve performed an in-depth survey here and my sense is only that – a sense – but one wonders if we’ve become inured to the horrors of the world. That we don’t have the heady optimism of the post-war boom to ride on to remind us that life doesn’t have to suck and that America can, indeed, be a good place again. When was the last great era of American optimism in our collective lives? The 1990s, right? That’s twenty years gone, folks. The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air is a barely remembered dream. Now it’s all zombie apocalypses and post-modern deconstructions of old sitcom tropes. It’s beheadings and ritualized cruelty. Our “escape” isn ‘t so much an escape as it is a funhouse mirror reflection of our real lives.

Then again, you could make the argument that this is actually healthy. That we aren’t sticking our heads in the sand; that we’re going to face our problems head-on for once. It could go either way, I suppose: either we will face down the dangers of our era with greater passion than before, or instead we will merely shrug and say “that’s life” and let the machine grind us up.

I got in one little fight and my mom got scared.
She said, “You’re movin’ with your auntie and uncle in Bel-Air.

OR maybe I’m just hand-wringing over nothing. I am sure of one thing though: nobody wants or needs a Suicide Squad sequel. Nobody.

Advertisements

About aahabershaw

Writer, teacher, gaming enthusiast, and storyteller. I write stories, novels, and occasional rants.

Posted on March 15, 2017, in Critiques, Theories, and Random Thoughts and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 6 Comments.

  1. I think one major part of the problem is that as a culture, we have stopped wanting a hero that we could aspire to be and traded that for a hero who’s a bit more like us. So the current antipathy towards the traditional version of Superman, who really was everything we were but better (both physically and psychologically) and we instead prefer characters who are conflicted, unhappy, and trying to make their way in a gray world – ala Batman, especially Alan Moore’s variation.

    Naturally both I think are coping mechanisms – as entertainment plays a role in helping us release our stresses. I do think it is a bit troubling that instead of looking to characters who rise above troubles and defeat them we as a culture now seem to largely prefer characters who are just as miserable, or conflicted as we are, just in different ways. It seems we would rather wallow in our suffering in entertainment, rather than watch entertainment that uplifts us and challenges us to try to be better, to try to win.

    I always liked Superman better.

  2. Martin L. Shoemaker

    I think it was Frank Miller who looked at the dark comics of the 90s and said, paraphrased: They took the easiest part of Dark Knight, the grim and gritty, and made that the ideal to aspire to.

    And it ruined comics for nearly a decade. Not because there’s no room for grim and gritty, but that shouldn’t be the only option. There’s an audience for other styles. The Marvel movies have their dark moments, but they’re all about overcoming that darkness, about aspiring to more.

    • Marvel would be a notable (and welcome) exception to this rule, but I was more thinking about television rather than movies.

      • Martin L. Shoemaker

        I blame J. Michael Straczynski (in part) for popularizing the season-long or even series-long story arc. If an arc is not to be faced too directly (and resolved too quickly), it needs to loom in the background. That pushes more towards secrets and conspiracies. And darkness. Even if you have some light, optimistic characters and moments, they appear naïve against the darker backdrop.

      • I like those arcs, though, and I don’t agree that they *have* to be dark and depressing. Secrets aren’t inherently grim–consider much of the run of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, which had season-long arc with dark opponents, but usually worked out with heroes on top.

  3. david korabell

    Of the dark & grim tv shows, I prefer the zany episodes – esp supernatural. Why can’t we have both?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: